About Me

Name:J.L.
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

The Now Dreaded Olympics: Why the Olympics in China this Year are so Politically Important

   As the Olympics draw nearer political tensions are rising. In Tibet rioting brought in China's PAP (Peoples armed Police) and its Army giving China yet another problem to face this year. All Tibetans (even non-rebels) are having a rough time during the rebellion cycle. It seems that Tibetan's cell phone communications are disconnected now and that they are now unable to contact their familys by any means of phone communications. Here we go again. China makes another big boo-boo.  But what about the cause of the rebels, is it right?
   First of all China is a Communist nation. I don't blame the Tibetans from wanting out of communist oppresion. Communism is no fun. Wait, I take that back. Communism is fun, for the head of state (the dictator). The oppresion on the Tibetans is tough with deaths, beatings, arrests, curfews, and people not being let out of certain areas because of the dangers of the Communist Army and Police. What will happen to Tibet? Will they be set free or will these riots fall on deaf ears, just like the Tianammen square riots? Only time will tell, but clearly the pro-Tibet freedom rioters are determined to be free of China's communist regime.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Second Amendment Rights: Drawing the Line

   The Second Amendment Rights case that went before the Supreme Court on Tuesday mainly focused on one thing: wording. Justice after justice asked the speakers where they believed the Militia clause ended and where the people clause began. This is a very important issue because if we do not know where the militia clause ends and where the people clause begins we will have no idea what we can and cannot do with guns outside of "A well regulated Militia..." (Second Amendment, United States Constitution) So where does the Militia clause end and where does the people clause begin? In my opinion, the people clause begins with the words "the right of the people..." In other words, for you language arts fanatics out there, right after the comma that makes the amendment a compound sentence. For those of you who are not language arts inclined just stick with what I said earlier. On a more serious note, let's get to what the people clause actually says.
   "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Now with some insightful commentary via myself "...the right of the people [you and I] to keep and bear arms, [to keep guns at home for use when necessary] shall not be infringed. [that right will not be taken away from you]" Did that help? I hope it shed some light on the amendment's wording.
   Whenever this amendment is taken into context and looked at carefully (and yes carefully does include analyzing compound sentences and commas, thanks language arts teacher) , in my opinion, you can come out with only one answer; the citizens of these United States have the right to keep and use wisely, guns.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Convention

   John McCain is the Republican nominee. The headlines are blaring it all across America. But let's take a look back at the beginning of his campaign. Senator John McCain started out this political year at the bottom of the list. With a blooper in his early campaigning the McCain campaign fell out of sight but, nevertheless, John McCain returned as the comback canidate (not "kid") in New Hampshire. After that Senator John McCain went on to win time after time, after time, after time, including the good-luck charm state of South Carolina. The Semnator continued his surge and made it to the day on which the whole campaign depended on; March 4, and it was on this day that John McCain became the presidential nominee. So what happened? Something funny happened on the campaign trail that gave John McCainthe nomination. Was it an endorsement? Was it a speech he gave? Or could it have just been that John McCain is what the Republican party wanted? We may never know, but one thing is for sure the Senator is the nominee for the Republican party and it is time we rally behind our canidate as we march on towards the general elections and, hopefully, a Republican victory.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

John McCain's Lobbyist Friends

   John McCain has some fine friends helping him get the votes of his fellow Senators and Congressmen. Time tested negotiaters with the powerful people in the Capitol building, the people that are helping him know what they're doing; they're none other then lobbyists. One of these lobbyists is even in charge of John McCain's relations with those on Capitol Hill. This is quite an effective campaign tactic to get endorsements and uncommitted delegates from Congress and the Senate. Say what you will about McCain's association with lobbyists but, in my opinion, this is a smart idea and quite a clever one at that. These experienced negotiaters that are for John McCain pose a great advantage for the Senator.  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The House and McCain: Unlikely allies in the campaign war

   Last Wednesday three house Republicans (including the Minority Whip) endorsed Senator John McCain as their nominee of choic for the presidential primaries in 2008. These unlikely endorsements add on to the string of other endorsements that the now popular presedential canidate has gotten in the past few months. It seems that since the race for the Republican nomination has narrowed down John McCain has won the big endorsements. Sen. McCain seems the heir apparent to the throne of the Republican party and now the one to define conservativism. This prospect seems so apparent only because of the support that has now gone to this Sentor; his opponents. Mitt Romney, a true conservative on everything but universal healthcare, gave his support to John McCain. House Republicans, many of who disagreed with John Mccain completely on the immigration issue, endorsed John McCain. And now it seems that John McCain is preparing for the endorsement of former President Bush Sr. This Republican election has come to a time of unlikely allies in a time of campaign wars. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Bush endorsement? An endorsement from a fromer president and what it means for Conservatives

   CNNpolitics.com reports that former President George Herbert Walker Bush is likely to endorse Senator John McCain next week as the Republican nominee for the presidency. What will this endorsement mean to John McCain? Well it can mean a number of things. First of all he will have his first endorsement from a former president. This could either help or hurt him. President Bush Sr. is a good conservative man (he served as vice president under Ronald Reagan after all) and he had many good conservative policies. The Conservative policies that he is most famous for is his defense policies, for which John McCain is also very popular for. While this endorsement will highlight John McCain as a true defense conservative will it make a big difference for McCain's campaign for the presidency? Only time will tell but one fact remains; if McCain is the nominee, standing with a president who lost big time when running for re-election may not help him win.
 
Bibliography
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Conservatism and Why We Must Preserve It

   The values of a staunch conservative American can basically be defined by two things good morals and some old fashioned logic. Conservatism takes a look at the broader aspect of the American people not the American government. Conservatives believe in fighting for the safety of our nation and its people, fighting for the safety of friendly nations, and keeping the peace when permissable. Conservatives believe in lower taxes, less earmarks in congressional spending bills, and a government who doesn't do everything for you.
Conservatives also believe saving the lives of our fellow citizen.
   These beliefs are what Conservatives believe and stand for and they must be preserved in order to continue the moral (and logical) ideas the founding fathers set forth in this great nation. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »